Editorials Video Articles News Columns Op-Ed Letters Blogs Press Photos Radio TV Newsletters
"Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors ..." -- U.S. Constitution
Endorsed by 2,110
State Legislators
In addition to 1,129 state legislative sponsors (shown above), 981 other legislators have cast recorded votes in favor of the National Popular Vote bill.
Tom Golisano

Entrepreneur Tom Golisano Endorses National Popular Vote

Editorial Support
Write Legislators
Enter your ZIP code:
Short Explanation
The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee a majority of the Electoral College to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The bill would reform the Electoral College so that the electoral vote in the Electoral College reflects the choice of the nation's voters for President of the United States.   more
9 Enactments
The National Popular Vote bill has been enacted into law in states possessing 132 electoral votes — 49% of the 270 electoral votes needed to activate the legislation.

  • Maryland - 10 votes

  • Massachusetts - 11

  • Washington - 12 votes

  • Vermont - 3 votes

  • DC - 3 votes
  • Hawaii - 4 votes
  • New Jersey - 14 votes
  • Illinois - 20 votes
  • California - 55 votes

  • Organizations
    Resources
    Popular Vote Video
    Class Election Video
    Read the Book
    Advisory Board
    John Anderson (R-I–IL)
    Birch Bayh (D–IN)
    John Buchanan (R–AL)
    Tom Campbell (R–CA)
    Tom Downey (D–NY)
    D. Durenberger (R–MN)
    Jake Garn (R–UT)
    Champions
    What Do You Think
    How should we elect the President?
    The candidate who gets the most votes in all 50 states.
    The current Electoral College system.

    Add this poll to your web site
    Debates
    70% Public Support
    31 Houses Pass Bill

    5. Myth that "Wrong Winner" Elections Are Rare




    5.1    MYTH: "Wrong winner" elections are rare, and therefore not a problem.

    There have been four "wrong winner" elections out of the nation's 55 presidential elections. This is a failure rate of 1 in 14. People who want to fly to Chicago wouldn't be very happy if their plane took them to Indianapolis once in 14 trips.

    Also, half of American presidential elections are popular-vote landslides (i.e., a margin of greater than 10% between the first- and second-place candidates). Almost any counting system will produce the correct winner in a popular-vote landslide. Thus, among the non-landslide elections, the failure rate is actually 1 in 7.

    We are currently in an era of non-landslide presidential elections (1988, 1992, 1996, 2000, 2004, and 2008). We should, therefore, not be surprised to have already had one "wrong winner" election in these six elections.

    Moreover, a shift of a handful of votes in one or two states would have elected the second-place candidate in five of the last 12 presidential elections. In 1976, for example, Jimmy Carter led Gerald Ford by 1,682,970 votes nationwide; however, a shift of 3,687 votes in Hawaii and 5,559 votes in Ohio would have elected Ford. In 2004, President George W. Bush was ahead by about 3,500,000 popular votes nationwide on election night; however, the outcome of the election remained in doubt until Wednesday morning because it was not clear which candidate was going to win Ohio's 20 electoral votes. In the end, Bush received 118,785 more popular votes than Kerry in Ohio, thus winning all of the state's 20 electoral votes and ensuring his re-election. However, if 59,393 voters in Ohio had switched in 2004, Kerry would have become President. This would have nullified Bush's lead of 3,500,000 popular votes nationwide.




    Reform the Electoral College so that the electoral vote reflects the nationwide popular vote for President